Juvenile Justice Reform

Posted by GVT Admin on Nov 2, 2022 10:45:00 AM

Juvenile Justice ReformFew people outside the social work profession are aware that juvenile justice is administered on a state-by-state basis. While there is no national system that establishes norms beyond the adult criminal justice system, (processes include arrest, detainment, petitions, hearings, adjudications, dispositions, placement, probation, and reentry) the juvenile justice system in most states operates according to the premise that youth are fundamentally different from adults, both in terms of level of responsibility and potential for rehabilitation. Whereas sentencing for a serious crime following a guilty verdict in the criminal justice system often results in jail or prison time, the juvenile justice system seeks to avoid incarceration whenever possible.

Crime and Punishment

Incarcerating young people costs state taxpayers across the nation billions of dollars each year while doing little to rehabilitate those who are locked up or reduce crime. Nearly 1 in 3 young people who were incarcerated — about 13,500 — are being held for low-level offenses, non-violent offenses, and pose little risk to public safety, according to the Prison Policy Initiative. Another 7,000 have not been found guilty and are awaiting trial. Young people who have been incarcerated are more likely to be arrested again and face barriers in obtaining an education and stable employment. Individuals incarcerated during adolescence, for example, are more likely to be re-incarcerated in their 20s and early 30s, to develop alcohol dependency, and to need assistance to meet their everyday needs.

Beyond Punishmentincarcerating young people

The juvenile justice system takes a significantly more restorative approach than the adult criminal justice system. Among juvenile justice social workers, there exists a firm belief that youth can and will lead healthy and constructive lives if given the opportunity to grow instead of being presumed irredeemable and segregated from their communities.


Youth incarceration has fallen dramatically over the last two decades. In 1997, 92,406 youth were confined in state and local facilities. That dropped to 31,392 youth in 2019. During roughly the same period, about half of all juvenile justice facilities closed — a drop from 3,047 facilities in 2000 to 1,510 in 2018. Youth justice reforms have already saved states millions of dollars and improved outcomes for young people without putting the public at risk. Even as states have arrested and incarcerated fewer youth, crime rates for young people have conti\ and are now at historic lows.

State by State

Over the past ten years, State lawmakers are making even greater strides both in the short- and long-term to ensure youth justice and equitable outcomes.

  • Georgia enacted a series of policies estimated to save the state $85 million over five years and reduce recidivism. House Bill 242 created a grant program in four counties that reduced the number of committed youth, shifted $30 million to community-based alternatives, and closed several juvenile facilities.
  • Through its Redeploy program, Illinois gives resources to counties to implement community-based programming for youth who would otherwise be placed in state-run facilities.
  • In 2018, Tennessee committed $4.5 million per year to expand community-based services and provide juvenile justice courts with more treatment options, particularly targeting low-income and rural areas in the state.
  • Under Wisconsin’s Youth Aids program, the state incentivizes community-based alternatives to incarceration by charging counties for most of the cost of each youth placed in state correctional facilities and, on the other hand, provides funding for each county to pay for community-based programming and services for justice-involved youth.
  • Kansas has cut the number of young people in confinement by over 50 percent and closed two youth prisons, saving the state millions of dollars.
  • A highly targeted extension effort of RECLAIM Ohio directs funding to six counties that historically committed the most youth to the state’s correctional system. The effort reduced youth prison admissions in these counties by about 80 percent over the span of a decade, from 989 youth in 2009 to just over 200 in 2019.
  • Arizona, California, Michigan, and Texas have all closed multiple youth correctional facilities in the past ten years.

The limited space in this blog does not permit us to showcase the progress made in all 50 states, but thanks to the active involvement of the social work community, juvenile justice reform has taken hold across the entire country.

Recommended Readings: 

Forensic Social Work...A little Deeper Dive

A Sacred Duty

Juvenile Justice...Case Closed 


Topics: Juvenile Justice

Subscribe Here!

Recent Posts





Search the Blog

  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.